Search for: "EDDINGS v. STATE" Results 1801 - 1820 of 12,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The judgment merely states thatcat conceptually confused “it is sufficient to recall that, according to settled case-law, the repute of a trade mark is relevant, in assessing the likelihood of confusion, only as regards the repute of the earlier mark”, citing Gitana v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA), T‑569/11 (2013) (para 98). [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for CNN, Marty Tankleff weighs in on Dassey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:38 pm
Republican Nat'l Comm., 759 A.2d 682, 695 (D.C.2000) (quoting Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. 16-1 (1998 ed.)); see also United Mine Workers of Am., Int'l v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 12:38 pm
Republican Nat'l Comm., 759 A.2d 682, 695 (D.C.2000) (quoting Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, No. 16-1 (1998 ed.)); see also United Mine Workers of Am., Int'l v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Regulatory Review, Richard Revesz argues that the solicitor general’s arguments in Seila Law v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, in a lawsuit involving a city’s redistricting maps and a state prison. [read post]