Search for: "English v. State" Results 1801 - 1820 of 6,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 12:52 am
Bearing this in mind, Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM, Carolus C. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:54 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He also stated that there is no public interest in the legal sense in the disclosure of private sexual encounters even if they involve infidelity or more than one person at the same time. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:05 am by Léon Dijkman
Whether this is a workable solution or in line with real-world practice – the UKSC itself stated that "it appears that [such caveats have] not been usual industry practice" – is not thoroughly addressed in the decision. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:19 am
Introduction: Margaret Tabb, Chair of English Department. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog, while I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am by Alexandra Allan
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am by Alexandra Allan
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am by Lisa Meller and Sophie Davis
A more recent example is Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd (2018) where the court stated that when considering reasonable steps to mitigate, a party should consider the interests of both contracting parties and not just its own. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:04 pm
How in English translation Våffeldagen became to be called "International" is unclear, and in any event it's a misnomer: American contrarians have declared August 24 -- the date in 1839 when a patent for the waffle iron issued -- to be Waffle Day in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:43 am
Monegasque stamps take some licking ...Judgment was delivered today by the General Court in Case T-197/13Monaco v OHIM (not yet available in English, though you can enjoy it in Maltese, Croatian or Estonian if you like). [read post]