Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 1801 - 1820 of 15,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2015, 12:39 pm
 His lawsuit essentially says that the firm agreed to provide him with disability benefits but "“undervalued” his benefits by computing them based on “artificially reduced salary figures. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:20 pm
 They get the point across, but in a close case, it's somewhat difficult to figure out what exactly those words mean.Like here.The relevant statutory words are "armed with a firearm". [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:26 pm
 Finally, the Court of Appeal holds that not only was the purported extortion protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, but is also immune from suit under the litigation privilege.Wow.Blackmail is an admittedly difficult doctrinal concept, and innumerable smart people have tried in vain to figure out why people can (1) demand money, and (2) voluntarily reveal private facts, and yet cannot do both simultaneously. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 3:17 pm
Normally, we would know what that would mean.But let's figure out if A can visit B in the following hypotheticals. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm
  They're very willing to follow the "lead" of authority figures. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 1:47 pm
"  Because then we're going to have to figure out if you were ever actually married in the first place.But today's opinion solves that problem for us. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:58 am by Howard Knopf
In a very unusual development in a case that promised to be very interesting and important both domestically and internationally, Apotex has filed a notice of discontinuance literally on the day before and figuratively on the steps into the Court in its appeal against Sanofi in the Supreme Court of Canada that was to have been heard earlier today in Apotex et al v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Mugambi Jouet, McGill Faculty of Law, has posted A Lost Chapter in Death Penalty History: Furman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Goldman
The court says Broughty qualified as a limited-purpose public figure. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:32 am
The full text of that decision is now available on BAILII as Applause Store Productions Ltd and Firsht v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by INFORRM
In a recent case management conference in the ongoing Yeo v Times Newspapers libel litigation (also see our blog ‘The End of Juries in Libel Trials? [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Charney v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of Charney v. [read post]