Search for: "Gray v. HAS" Results 1801 - 1820 of 1,985
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
• "However, given that the risks associated with [the Part 36 clause] are so difficult to assess, it would, perhaps, be worth considering whether it would make sense for solicitors who wish to offer it to include in the CFA a variant of the two-stage success fee discussed in Callery v Gray [2001] EWCA Civ 1117, in the form of a clause giving them the right to review the success fee once an offer to which the clause applies… [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
In 2007, many of the restrictions had been struck down by a federal judge in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:44 am
[This case has snake bite written all over it.]Eduardo Guerrero v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 8:20 pm
From the post:In the first, United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:02 am
 It has 168 parties, where the 1949 GCs have 194. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
I hadn't noticed until today that the Army Litigation Division lawyer who is "of counsel" for the United States in the Gray v. [read post]