Search for: "Gregory v. State"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 1,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The Government's first expert, Professor Gregory T. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:36 am
7 (2010) (Reines.2010) Gregory P. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
Gregory Kellam Scott, Hon. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
Westling, Senior Assistant Appellate CounselRepresenting Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
This opinion was the first reported Fourth Circuit opinion regarding a traffic stop since Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
The Yearling - (1946) (Deer) (Gregory Peck) 13. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am
Kagan advised Justice Marshall to vote to deny cert. in DeShaney v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 1:57 pm
The DOL has stated that it intended the Final Rule to provide clarity by casting a uniform joint employment standard to avoid disparate interpretations by circuit courts throughout the country. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
Gregory P. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:53 am
The Supreme Court, in the 5-3 decision in McCoy v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:04 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:54 am
Examples are drawn from research problems that became evident in Abbott v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
His verdict in Benedi v. [read post]
