Search for: "HILL v. STATE" Results 1801 - 1820 of 5,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2024, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 3 October and Friday 4 October 2024, there was a trial before Hill J in the case of Oliver v Duffy KB-2023-002483. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre-answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:29 am
The state also relied on comments the Supreme Court made (not necessary to the decision) in Knowles v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
” At The Hill, Hayato Watanable argues that “it’s time we had an Asian-Pacific American on the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:33 pm by Melissa Tatum
United States for the wrongful taking of the Black Hills is sitting untouched in the US treasury decades after that decision was handed down illustrates the latter proposition. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am by Steve Lubet
            In 1949, federal district trial Judge Harold Medina issued criminal contempt specifications against the five lawyers representing the eleven members of the Communist Party tried and convicted of conspiracy in the case titled United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:50 am
Hill delivered the decision.J. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:36 am by Shawn Dominy
No Contest Plea RejectedThe case decided last week is State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm by Alfred Brophy
Now that classes are done here in lovely Chapel Hill, I want to take a breath for a moment and talk about articles I've been reading. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 11:03 am
Hill delivered the opinion for the court.Link: http://tinyurl.com/6eptdw . [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:33 am by Adam Chandler
In response to a question, the Chief Justice acknowledged that each member of the Court decides for him- or herself whether to attend the President’s State of the Union addresses. [read post]