Search for: "Holder v. United States" Results 1801 - 1820 of 3,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am by Maryland Law Review
United States: Good Faith, Retroactivity, and the Loss of Principle Brandon K. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
There is a need for more patent quality in SEPs" he stated. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am by Florian Mueller
In this case, there can be no doubt that Continental is economically affected (and would be even if without an obligation to indemnify customers) by SEP holders collecting royalties on cars that come with Continental's telematics control units. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm by admin
The brief comes as a response to a recent decision by the Second Circuit to limit the protections under Section 109 of the Copyright Act to works created within the United States in John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that the ruling in Barton “has made it harder for longtime green card holders with a criminal conviction to remain in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Various legal changes from the 1980s onwards in the United States have been identified as responsible for making the American legal climate friendlier to patent holders, which in turn has spurred more applications. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:21 am by Erin Miller
United States, in which the Court recently granted cert. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 12:07 pm by Dan Markel
Department of Justice & Ex Officio Member United States Sentencing Commission   Program Description On August 12, 2013, Attorney General Holder released a memorandum entitled “Department Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Drug Cases. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The title report revealed that co-defendant Maxcine Holder (“Holder”) owned the unit, rather than Kinder, and further revealed the existence of two outstanding mortgages; an outstanding judgment of foreclosure; a lien for unpaid common charges; tax liens; and a certificate of occupancy designating the unit as a doctor’s office (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “title defects” or “title issues”). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The title report revealed that co-defendant Maxcine Holder (“Holder”) owned the unit, rather than Kinder, and further revealed the existence of two outstanding mortgages; an outstanding judgment of foreclosure; a lien for unpaid common charges; tax liens; and a certificate of occupancy designating the unit as a doctor’s office (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “title defects” or “title issues”). [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The title report revealed that co-defendant Maxcine Holder (“Holder”) owned the unit, rather than Kinder, and further revealed the existence of two outstanding mortgages; an outstanding judgment of foreclosure; a lien for unpaid common charges; tax liens; and a certificate of occupancy designating the unit as a doctor’s office (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “title defects” or “title issues”). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm by Shirin Sinnar
  For those not within the United States, some individuals with substantial connections to the United States may have some protection. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 12:04 pm by Zak Gowen
”[16] Of course, it is hard to imagine that any drug sold in the United States does not enter the stream of California commerce. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:38 am by PaulKostro
Pursuant to the BCA, a shareholder is “a holder of record of shares in a corporation” with shares being “the units into which the proprietary interests in a corporation are divided. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:16 am by SHG
Judulang’s fitness to remain in the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEvidence Union Officer's Prior Bad Acts Admissible to Show Intent in Trial for Hobbs Act Extortion, Embezzlement United States v. [read post]