Search for: "In re Bush"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 6,231
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2008, 11:46 pm
The Paluson-Pelosi-Bush Plan is a bailout, not an investment. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:21 pm
And, yeah, they are different from Bush. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 9:01 am
The guy’s as light a lightweight as I can imagine – he makes Bush look like Schopenhauer. [read post]
RICK PERRY’S POLITICAL OPENING IS A BIG SUCCESS: Wednesday saw a full-blown media hyperventilation …
17 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm
If you’re living through a seventies rerun, why not look like a seventies clean-up hero? [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:47 am
I was also wondering if any of the other candidates had a problem with the same two families being in charge of the executive branch of government for 28 consecutive years, if Hillary Clinton were to potentially be elected and then re-elected. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
Since the calculator has been rewritten from scratch, I've made it much easier to define new scenarios and legislation as they're proposed. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 1:32 am
We’re talking about Speaker John Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 9:18 am
Bush of having lifted significant portions of his memoirs, Decision Points, from various non-fiction sources. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:36 am
If so, here’s what he missed: “We're not going to be oblique,” wrote the New York Times editorial board in “The Failed Attorney General.” “Bush should dismiss Mr. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:58 pm
And if Obama wins re-election, well the same applies. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:27 pm
In order to get nominees through, deals were going to get cut.One of the deals was that Roger Gregory, who had only a short time remaining on the Fourth Circuit as a Clinton recess appointee, would get re-nominated by President Bush. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
The Democrats are not trying to repeal any Bush tax cuts. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 2:46 pm
"The hard part is when you're dealing with an important statute whose constitutionality is in question," Kelley said. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
If we’re serious about the need for more diversity in the workplace because it makes the workplace better (and you’ll have to decide whether you’re serious or not), it has to happen in the C-Suite. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
The majority opinion in Bush v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:36 am
Just think of it this way: if the President could sign a trade agreement, then modify it at will, and still have it covered by TPA, then why did President Bush and his USTR rush to complete and sign the original KORUS by June 30, 2007? [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:48 pm
On that basis, feel free to create your own Bush/Clinton mash-up (watch your volume). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:45 am
For Bush, the "Republican Form of Government" is equivalent to "Government by the Republican Party. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 4:43 pm
Bush pulled it back. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:30 am
Why has no Republican stepped up and criticized Bush? [read post]
