Search for: "In re Robert B." Results 1801 - 1820 of 2,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
Mostyn J also held that the implied undertaking bound not just the parties receiving the disclosure of their spouses, but also the media (following the lead of Roberts J in Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 2314). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
My slides.This is going to be an opinionated overview; I know you’re an expert audience and I’m going to try to highlight developments you may have heard less about or at least spent less time thinking about. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Robert Liles
NEW — Abusive ordering, certifying, referring, or prescribing of Part A or B services, items or drugs. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am by Robert Liles
NEW — Abusive ordering, certifying, referring, or prescribing of Part A or B services, items or drugs. 42 C.F.R. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
 February 1, 2021 ​​ Appellate Division, First Department Appellate Divison affirms Charging Lien based upon account stated where no objection to invoices during year long representation               In Trafelet v Cipolla & Co., LLC, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 189200, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
France has been hit by an unprecedented economic crisis as a result of COVID-19, with its GDP contracting by 6 per cent in the first quarter of 2020. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
We’re the good guys; they are the bad guys. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
" (Editor's note: we're not at all sure we agree that it is the only compensation available.) [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am by Aaron Tang
Given the Court’s recent decsion to uphold Section 5 in North Austin Municipal District, this gamble only makes sense in light of the demonstrated willingness of the Roberts’ court to strike down even recently affirmed precedent (Citizens’ United reversal Austin and McConnell) and to reach issues that are not squarely presented in a case in order to narrow the protections of laws the conservative majority disfavors (e.g., elevating the bar for meeting the commonality… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Often, a felony conviction leads to felons going on public assistance, collecting disability or becoming so desperate that they feel compelled to re-offend, commit new crimes or simply violate the terms of their parole so that they end up back in the system. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am by FDABlog HPM
We’re still poring over the nooks and crannies of the decision, but for now, here’s the bottom line: (1)  The Court finds impossibility here. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:25 am by Rantanen
"  "You're getting warmer," Justice Breyer quipped. [read post]
2 Jan 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
An excerpt from Friday's more-than-9000-word-long opinion in In re Bynum, by the Texas Special Court of Review ("Robert Burns, Chief Justice of the Fifth Court of Appeals; Justice W. [read post]