Search for: "In re Sullivan "
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2009, 2:43 pm
Still, we're better off now than we were with the typewriter and print indexes to periodicals. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:59 pm
Marketing and Advertising * In re Gemtronics (FTC ALJ decision Sept 16, 2009). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:27 pm
Instead, it cements their mutual love, affection, and friendship (if they're lucky). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:25 pm
The below post was written before the South Korean edition of W Magazine was spotted out in the wild with Demi Moore's hip re-attached. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:19 am
They’re delightfully accessible general talks on various aspects of English and comparative law. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Re-Examining Customary International Law and the Federal Courts. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:48 am
They're paying market-level bonuses this year. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:24 am
As long as I've ever worked here, they've given a "standard bonus" (the market rate) when you're around 1950 hours (give or take 100 or 200), and then deviate if you're drastically higher or lower. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:12 am
An Auburn judge should not only deny any motion filed by a U of A attorney, he should hold them in contempt of court and make them swear to tell the truth under an oath to Pat Sullivan. [read post]
Update: Sex, Drugs, and 3000 Billable HoursDefendant law firm moves to strike 'scandalous' material.
18 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Sullivan & Cromwell with each new filing. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:05 am
Sullivan wrote. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:04 am
Sullivan & Cromwell topped Cravath's bonus by $5,000 for senior associates (class of 2002). [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
Law - Employment - Paul Volcker - Financial services - Sullivan & Cromwell [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
" Junior transactional lawyers in New York and Cali, we hope you're keeping your hours up. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:51 am
If you're at Fried Frank, feel free to compare notes about your bonuses in the comments. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell publication by Robert E. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:44 pm
They're also far more potent. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
We're still waiting to hear what senior people are getting. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
 If we’re in a rush to impose emission controls, as Krugman claims, this is the wrong path to take. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
You're idiots â€" he says, in so many words: Do I believe any of [what Palin has written]? [read post]
