Search for: "July 1, 2013 - July 2, 2013" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Mack’s Criminal Law  2. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Cornerstone Research report is based on its analysis of SEC enforcement actions brought between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2021. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 2013 WL 5848859, No. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Stephen Bilkis
The People alleged that on January 7, 1985, defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in Nassau County and sentenced to a term of incarceration of 2½ years. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:08 pm by David Frakt
  So, for example, if a law school had 100 graduates in May 2015, and they all took the bar, and 60 passed in July 2015, then 10 more passed in February 2016, then 4 more passed in July 2016, then 1 more passed in February 2017, the school would have an “Ultimate Bar Passage 2015” rate of 75%. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:29 am by JP Zanders
The Executive Council of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) held its 94th session from 7–10 July. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
  On October 11, 2013, Job.com served Olney with a set of Request for Production of Tangible Things that sought production of(1) the cell phone [Olney] alleges he was called on in violation of the TCPA; and (2) the home computer [he] testified at his deposition he used to conduct his job search. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
[Yes]Precedential No. 21: IKEA Gets Split Decision Against AKEA: Section 2(d), Yes in Part; Dilution, NoCAN DEW for Nutritional Drink Mixes Confusable With Pepsico's Famous DEW Mark, Says TTABCITIAIR for Travel Agency Confusable With Famous "CITI" Family of Marks, Says TTABSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness:Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is DIAMOND Merely Descriptive of Paper-Cutting Dies? [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:57 am by Jonathan Bailey
Still, many are noting the change in tone of Pallante, who previously said that copyright would no longer be effective without stronger legislation, such as the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). 2: Julie Taymor’s Lawsuit Over ‘Spider-Man’ Musical Set for May Trial Next up today, Eriq Gardner at The Hollywood Reporter Esquire reports that playwright Julie Taymor may be getting her day in court against her former partners, even if she doesn’t want it. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:19 pm by Donald Clarke
Qualifications and requirements law degree (JD or LLB) or PhD in the humanities or social sciences in hand by July 1, 2014. fluency in English and Chinese. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
Petrobras is one of the largest state owned petroleum TNCs in Latin America and one that is deeply embedded in corruption investigations  (here and here (including the write off of over $2 billion in bribe payments)) that reached all the way to the office of the President of the Republic (here). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Kader Kadem
Turkey (Application no. 29411/07)JUDGMENT (17 September 2013)STRASBOURGPROCEDURE1. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:27 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The trial court ruled that the limitations period began to run when plaintiff was arrested on May 16, 2013, and that his July 27, 2015 suit was thus untimely. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings A ruling and two resolution statements have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: Resolution Statement 05896-18 Alexander v The Times, provision 1 (accuracy), resolved via ISPO mediation 04767-18 A Woman v Harlow Star, principles 1, 2 (privacy) and 7 (children in sex cases), no breach after investigation Resolution Statement 05309-18 Dark v express.co.uk, principle 1, resolved via IPSO mediation Statements in Open Court and… [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:18 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Additionally, the court’s order must (1) minimize any interruption of the business operations of  third parties and the defendant that is unrelated to trade secret that has allegedly been misappropriated; (2) protect the property from disclosure to plaintiff; (3) set a hearing date no later than seven days after the order is issued; and (4) require a security adequate to cover damages from a wrongful or excessive seizure. [read post]