Search for: "Key v. State"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 19,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
The US Supreme Court has finished oral argument for the term, and about the only key criminal case still undecided is Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 5:47 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
We’ve blogged about state laws directed at ownership of (and privacy regarding) employee social media [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:14 am
Facts: This case (Wilks v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:40 am
Case Citation: Doe v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:00 am
Company – Chevron v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
The Florida Legislature meets yearly in Tallahassee, the State’s Capitol, to craft new legislation during a two month session. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:14 am
Specifically, the chamber president is referring to the case of Castellanos v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 10:48 am
Mgmt., LLC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: The first key trend from our 15th Annual Workplace Class Action Litigation Report involves rulings by the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 12:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
Georgia State University, which is currently on appeal at the 11th Circuit.) [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 2:26 pm
" At that point, the video cuts to the key clip. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
In Goodman v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 1:45 pm
As always, the agencies’ applications of these terms in specific situations and implementations in the field will be the keys for projects potentially affected. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:25 am
Where officers were unable to recall seizing and obtaining the particular items, the booking officer testified about his routine in providing seized drugs to the arresting officer and the arresting officer refreshed his recollection by reviewing his inventory report, in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:23 am
As I read the opinion, there are three key take-away points: The individual mandate is outside of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause & the Necessary and Proper Clause because (a) it is not itself a regulation of commerce, and (b) the decision not to purchase insurance is not "economic activity" that would trigger the substantial cumulative effects test of Wickard v. [read post]
