Search for: "Law v. State" Results 1801 - 1820 of 157,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 7:55 am by Michael Lowe
State of Texas:   The post Success in Intoxication Manslaughter Case Before Fort Worth Court of Appeals: Patterson v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:27 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
The trial court concluded that law enforcement officers' failure to perform their community caretaker function warranted dismissal of [...] [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:50 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Motor Vehicles OWI; prior convictions Prior suspensions of a driver's operating privilege under another state's 'zero tolerance' law are convictions within the meaning of secs. 343.307(1)(d) and 340.01(9r). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:04 am
The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the "maximum term of imprisonment . . . prescribed by law" for the state drug convictions at issue includes state recidivist enhancements, which in this case was a ten-year maximum. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Detaining child A jury, in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, convicted April Carrington, appellant, of detaining her minor child (the “Child”) in another state with the intent to deprive the Child’s lawful custodian of custody. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:43 am by Lawrence Solum
Hasen (Loyola Law School Los Angeles) has posted The Nine Lives of Buckley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:50 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Last year the Supreme Court upheld an Arizona law in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm by Naomi Shatz
Massachusetts State Police, an employment discrimination case raising the question of whether denying a police officer a lateral transfer to different troop could be a discriminatory under our state anti-discrimination law. [read post]