Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 13,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
Nonetheless, one advantage of a bright-line rule is the lack of a need to figure out how much hitting is too much. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
USA v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
Pix Credit HEREThe folks over at the Völkerrechtsblog have posted an excellent essay by Andrew Forde (Visiting Fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:16 am
So ruled the Supreme Court of Canada today in R. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:31 am
Esther Salas in FTC v Wyndham, et al: See Am. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:04 am
The convictions are now overturned.The case is Kelly v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:30 am
According to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Lange v. [read post]
"You Have the Right to an Attorney..." We All Know the Hollywood Version, But What's the Real Story?
15 Mar 2013, 11:23 am
Until Gideon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:31 am
Esther Salas in FTC v Wyndham, et al: See Am. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 4:40 am
Many people, I suspect, think it is illegal for officers to trick people in order to gather evidence of a crime (or, as some argue, to create the conduct that's later charged as a crime). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:40 pm
Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
In the recent case of Atalla v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
’People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:26 am
I think this is quite right, though the line that "giving offense" is itself a "viewpoint" (a line borrowed from the Matal plurality) is a bit imprecise: The underlying point is that, when speech offends people because the views it expresses -- such as demeaning or disparaging views of certain groups -- are offensive, excluding such speech is discrimination based on viewpoint. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:47 am
One of them is New York City’s enforcement policy, which essentially treats Terry v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:03 am
Don Caldwell v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
He regularly misidentified people, was delusional, and was sometimes disoriented. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 10:37 pm
Continental, which was related to the recently-settled Nokia v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:00 am
Some people refer to these tactics as "hardball" litigation tactics. [read post]
