Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 45,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2015, 7:06 am
Here: Two Shields Cert Petition ILTF Amicus Brief in Support of Petition Law Profs Amicus Brief in Support of Petition Questions presented: In Temple v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:02 am
In this long standing litigation between Oracle and Google, a dispute arose over the protective order and whether the disclosure of certain information violated the terms of the protective order when it was disclosed in open court. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:37 am
Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
” The court also noted that the US has long asserted its eminent domain authority to take private property and state-owned property. [read post]
19 May 2017, 3:16 am
Scudder v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:26 am
In OTO, L.L.C. v. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
What constitutes “material” evidence has long been a source of legal confusion and disharmony within the justice system, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s attempt in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:56 am
In the span of two days, two United States Court of Appeals held that a nationwide class action could proceed against a defendant as long as the named plaintiff could satisfy specific personal jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm
On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Castellanos et al., v. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
What constitutes “material” evidence has long been a source of legal confusion and disharmony within the justice system, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s attempt in United States v. [read post]
FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE DUTY TO DISCLOSE FAVORABLE EVIDENCE WITHOUT REGARD TO MATERIALITY HAUNTS COURTS
17 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
What constitutes “material” evidence has long been a source of legal confusion and disharmony within the justice system, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s attempt in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
Hill, Loving Lessons: White Supremacy, Loving v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
United States in 2001); and even one’s own front porch (Florida v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:31 am
(Eugene Volokh) After a long discussion of the breadth of the speech restriction involved in the case, Chief Justice Roberts’ majority in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am
Writing for the majority, Justice Ginsburg relied on "that unwritten but long-standing rule" that "an appellate court may not alter a judgment to benefit a nonappealing party," as well as the express limitations on government appeals in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:07 pm
Perhaps discussion of the November 30, 2009, opinion by the United States Supreme Court in Porter v. [read post]
