Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 1801 - 1820 of 20,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm by Jon May
But if persons with security clearances don’t automatically lose their clearance upon leaving the government, why is a former President’s unlimited authority any different? [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
Code 47(b) One of the most surprising parts of this opinion was the court’s treatment of hiQ’s intentional interference with a contract tort and unfair competition law claims. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:06 pm by Abdo Law Firm
The criminal retail fraud matter will not be dropped just because this amount is paid. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:03 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Once one makes the leap to own/lease a car, taking a drive seems to be "free," and in an important sense, it almost is.To consider taking a Lyft ride is, in every instance, to confront the very salient question: "Do I want to spend (say) $15 to go from A to B? [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:36 am by Emma Snell
“It’s only a matter of time before it will be necessary to use stronger measures. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 3:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
I also think that, for a showing of substantial burden, it wouldn't be enough for a claimant to say that she disagrees with the law's moral or religious underpinnings, for instance because she doesn't believe that human life starts at conception, or because she doesn't believe that animals have a right not to be slaughtered for food. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am by Russell Knight
If you want more time with your children no matter what the Guardian Ad Litem says don’t get mad…get even. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:15 am by Michael Geist
During clause-by-clause, the government isn’t much interested in serious amendment, with one Liberal MP robotically claiming most amendments are loopholes for big tech and another characterizing digital news outlets as not real news. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
And until that interpretation changes again, it is the law.Thus, according to the Sistersong court, there is a constitutional right to abortion during whatever time the Supreme Court says there is one, and there is no constitutional right to abortion after the Supreme Court says there isn’t one—but, importantly, the current Court cannot retroactively affect the previous status (existence/non-existence) of a constitutional right found by a previous Court; the most it can do is… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am by Eric Goldman
This result, however, does not convince me that the University intended to allow off-topic comments as a matter of course…. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Another employee noted that “Google automatically assumes you mean [the F]lora[-B]ama [Lounge]. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Daniel Shaviro
Taking that as given, it's worse if we have the accountant's problem than if we don't. [read post]