Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 1801 - 1820 of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
. - (1) The Director- General of Civil Aviation or any other officer specially empowered in this behalf by the Central Government may, from time to time, by order, issue directions, consistent with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder, with respect to any of the matters specified in [clauses (aa), (b), (c), (e), (f), (g), (ga), (gb), (gc)], (h), (i), (m) and (qq) of sub-section (2) of section 5, to any person or persons using any aerodrome or… [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:42 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Rule 4:50-2 provides that the motion should be made in a response time, “… and for reasons (a), (b) and (c) of R. 4:50-1 not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
However, many can also be configured to allow participants to: a) display audio or video recordings; b) instantly share files through the application; and, c) share all or part of their computer screens, a feature that is especially helpful when reviewing complex documents. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:02 pm
Falsification, as discussed in Allegations A, B, C, and D. 2. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
When applied to any of section (a), (b) or (c) of the law, we need to apply the change from the case: the routine now needs to say it covers all “gestures, actions, attitude and the entire comportment” of person p. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:42 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Rule 4:50-2 provides that the motion should be made in a response time, “… and for reasons (a), (b) and (c) of R. 4:50-1 not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken. [read post]
18 May 2014, 2:54 am by SHG
While (c) is uncontroversial, both (a) and (b) appear to need some significant fleshing out. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:31 pm by Glenn Reynolds
But the time came to make a bit of a statement, no matter how small, about the utter hypocrisy and double standards. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 8:41 am by Eric
I trust others will be rolling out those deconstructions over the coming months. 2) Based on responses to my initial Forbes post, I'm clearer that subpart (c) does not change the interpretation of subpart (a). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
In Ashok Kumar Mittal, this Court pointed out that present system of levying meagre costs in civil matters (or no costs in some matters), is wholly unsatisfactory and does not act as a deterrent to vexatious or luxury litigation borne out of ego or greed, or resorted to as a `buying-time' t [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:34 am by Russell Knight
§552(c) What If I Have No Knowledge Of My Divorce And I’m In The Military? [read post]