Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1801 - 1820
of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 7:56 am
There are references for preliminary rulings from national courts, which require interpretation of Directive 2008/95, and there are appeals from the General Court on Community trade mark matters, which require consideration of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:54 pm
It then affirmed the Section 2(e)(1) refusal, finding the mark merely descriptive of a feature of game software. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
” Id. at 17 (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
” Id. at 17 (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:50 am
Sophisticated consumers would no longer pay higher than necessary mark-ups on clothing, and that it wasn’t a sign that you were cheap if you shopped at Syms, but that you were savvy. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:16 pm
Anyway, the court then goes on to address generic terms: even though they’re never marks, “it is quite another matter to conclude that a competitor's use of a trademark symbol with a generic mark constitutes a literally false statement of fact. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
Don’t rely on inexperience to defend you and don’t attempt to represent yourself in any criminal matter. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
Caveat: classifications are legal matters and surveying on them may be a bad idea. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
iLawyer 30 Min Strategy Session iLawyer Marking First Appearance If today’s podcast resonates with you and you haven’t read The Small Firm Roadmap Revisited yet, get the first chapter right now for free! [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:24 am
" The post Quoting Alleged Threat and Calling It a Threat Isn't Libel appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:32 pm
Strong contract terms, after all, don’t matter unless someone is willing to enforce them. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:00 pm
" And fourth, its Director of Operations averred that JibJab has never received a complaint about the mark during two years of use.The Board observed that a showing that a mark is "vulgar" suffices to establish that it "consists of or comprises immoral ... or scandalous matter" within the meaning of Section 2(a). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 2:23 am
’ The question requires an examination of the prohibition on “immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:31 am
If you’re killed in an auto collision you probably won’t even know it. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:34 am
If you're killed in an auto collision you probably won't even know it. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Dilution: does consumer perception matter? [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm
In the decision under appeal, the opposition division came to the conclusion that:- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request, the first auxiliary request as well as the fourth auxiliary request did not meet the requirements of Article 123(2) EPC;- the subject-matter of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request did not meet the requirements of Article 54 EPC; and- the third auxiliary request was not to be admitted into the opposition proceedings.III. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
It doesn’t ban speech (since people remain free to use even unregistered marks). [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Unfortunately, trademark law doesn’t quite work that way. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:47 am
Reasonable viewers, however, wouldn’t think that this billboard criticizing Louisiana Gov. [read post]
