Search for: "Montana State Supreme Court" Results 1801 - 1820 of 2,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Joe Palazzolo
Testing Citizens United: Our own Jess Bravin has more on the Montana Supreme Court’s ruling late last week that the U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Writing for the Montana Supreme Court majority, Chief Justice Mike McGrath said the state had never lost a “compelling interest to enact” the law. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Nabiha Syed
Lyle Denniston of this blog reports on the Montana Supreme Court’s decision to ban independent corporate spending on state elections, a decision seemingly in conflict with the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:59 am by Sam Favate
On Friday, the Montana Supreme Court restored a 100-year-old state ban on direct spending by corporations on political candidates or committees, saying that the U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:46 am by Rick Hasen
  The Montana Court upheld the state’s ban on corporate spending in elections despite the U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 3:44 pm by Charles L Zelden
From the Texas Redistricting case on SCOTUS’s January 9 docket to Florida’s ongoing litigation over its election law “reforms” to the Montana Supreme Court’s rejection of Citizen United’s holding last Friday that independent spending by corporations do NOT corrupt the electoral process (the Montana court’s response is that, as a factual matter, such spending has been corrupting in the past), election law and… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:51 pm by Calvin Massey
Yes, said the Montana Supreme Court in Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
" And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Eugene Volokh has a post titled "Montana Supreme Court vs. the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Attorney General, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a ban on corporate expenditures to speak in support of or opposition to political candidates — pretty much the same sort of ban that the United States Supreme Court struck down in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Montana Supreme Court on Friday put to work its own view of what the Supreme Court had decided in the controversial ruling allowing massive corporate spending in political campaigns, and came out differently: the state court upheld a 99-year-old state ban on the use of corporations’ own money to support or oppose any candidate in state elections. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
Montana’s HB 245 took a different tack; rather than expanding the state’s supreme court to achieve certain decisions this proposal would have shrunk the court from 7 to  5 (under Montana’s constitition the legislature may make such a reduction with a simple statute; no constitutional amendment required as in Florida). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
Florida‘s HJR 7111, while initially introduced in order to split the state’s supreme court, was heavily amended. the version appearing on ballot in 2012 would require Senate confirmation of Supreme Court appointments, allow the legislature to reject Supreme Court rules by a majority vote, and give legislators access to judicial misconduct investigations. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:25 am by Bill Raftery
Now comes the latest proposal, this one an effort to eliminate the state’s Supreme Court and main trial court, the Superior Court. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:04 am by Paul Freehling
By Paul Freehling As a result of a recent ruling by the Montana Supreme Court in a case of first impression in that state, an employer there -- as in several other states -- ordinarily will not be permitted to enforce a non-compete provision in an employment agreement where the employer was solely responsible for ending the employment relationship. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:23 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0682, 2011 MT 322, JEANNETTE DIAZ, LEAH HOFFMANN-BERNHARDT, and REACHEL LAUDON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:11 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0613, 2011 MT 321, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:49 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0054, 2011 MT 314, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:45 am
More troublesome, though, is an Oregon Supreme Court opinion from the '80s, in which "media" was singled out for enhanced protection under the constitution in defamation cases. [read post]