Search for: "NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE" Results 1801 - 1820 of 2,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2010, 1:51 pm by Andrew Raff
National Football League (08–661) [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Bloomberg celebrated the National Football League's vote to play the 2014 Super Bowl at the new home of the New York Jets and Giants by unofficially renaming 48th Street in Times Square, "Super Bowl XLVIII Street. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
NFL for NPR, Nina Totenberg described the case as “a Hail Mary pass by the NFL . . . with other sports leagues cheering on the football league. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:00 am by Brad Walz
National Football League, the National Football League Properties ("NFLP") terminated its nonexclusive license with American Needle, Inc. to make and sell apparel bearing the NFL team insignias and granted Reebok International Ltd. an exclusive 10-year license to make and sell trademarked headwear for all 32 NFL teams. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:55 am by buslawblogger
In stark contrast, the Supreme Court yesterday found the 32-team National Football League... [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:47 am
" Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal reports that "High Court Broadsides NFL in Antitrust Case; The National Football League 'snatched defeat from the jaws of victory,' according to one antitrust expert. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm by Erin Miller
NFL – holding that the National Football League is not a single entity exempt from antitrust laws – drew most of the attention. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:13 pm by Randy Picker
In the National Football League, 9-0 means three field goals, perhaps a tight defensive battle in the snow in the NFC’s black-and-blue division. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
The National Football League’s owners had won a major exemption from Sherman Act liability in the Seventh Circuit Court for themselves and for the owners in other pro leagues. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:38 pm by rtruman
National Football League :: What the Ruling Means to the League [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:47 pm
In brief, a 2001 agreement made between Reebok International and the National Football League (NFL) granted Reebok an exclusive licence for the rights to use the NFL's (i.e., all 32 NFL teams) IP (team trade marks, logos, etc) for baseball caps and other apparel. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:20 am by Jennifer Stephens
The Supreme Court has decided that the National Football League is out of look trying for an antitrust exemption in marketing caps and such under a single business model rather than 32 individual teams.Court: NFL is 32 teams, not single business By JESSE J. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:57 am by Marc Edelman
Above the Law has regularly blogged about why the National Football League should not be treated as a single entity under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:41 am
NFL [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the National Football League (NFL) [league website] and its member teams are not a single entity that is exempt from rule of reason claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act [text]. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:21 am by Ted Frank
National Football League isn't a tenth as important as everyone is going to be telling you over the next few days. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Trademark / Antitrust: The Supreme Court has ruled against the National Football League (NFL) in an antitrust suit involving the NFL's exclusive apparel licensing deal with Reebok/Adidas. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:14 am by Tony Mauro
It was a rare plantiffs' win in an antitrust case this morning as the Supreme Court ruled unanimously against the National Football League in its bid to be viewed as a single enterprise immune from antitrust scrutiny. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:16 am by Gene Quinn
National Football League   Of course, hyperbole of this kind is all too easy and much overused, particularly when one is so close to such an important event. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Rejecting the National Football League’s claim that it has across-the-board immunity to antitrust law when its teams join in a commercial activity, the Supreme Court unanimously cleared the way Monday for trial of a lawsuit against the joint marketing of the right to use the teams’ logos and trademarks on consumer goods. [read post]