Search for: "No. 337" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 9:18 pm by Eric Schweibenz
No. 337-TA-562) against ClearCorrect Operating, LLC of Houston, Texas (“ClearCorrect USA”), ClearCorrect Pakistan (Private), Ltd. of Pakistan (“ClearCorrect Pakistan”), Mr. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:29 am by ebcarpenter
CCRP 326 Condition of the bail undertaking CCRP 327 Requisites of the bail undertaking CCRP 327.1 Bail restrictions to be transmitted to louisiana protective order registry CCRP 328 Substitution of security CCRP 329 Contract to indemnify surety CCRP 330 Bail before conviction CCRP 330.1 Detention; bail hearing CCRP 330.2 Bail hearing for certain sex offenders; detention CCRP 331 Capital offenses CCRP 332 Bail after conviction CCRP 333 Authority to fix bail CCRP 334 Factors in… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
With the House and Senate furiously trying to pass the CVD/NME "fix" legislation (H.R. 4105) that was formally introduced this morning, now's a perfect time to examine the bill and ask one simple question:  Why the heck is everybody on the Hill and in the White House in such a rush to sign this puppy into law without formal analysis and consideration of its substantial weaknesses? [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 4:30 am by Paul Roeder
— Standing and the ITC’s domestic industry requirementPut simply, Section 337 requires that an ITC complainant show that, as of the time of filing, (a) it maintains a certain level of economic activity within the United States in connection with the asserted intellectual property right, and (b) this economic activity is devoted to exploiting the intellectual property right at issue (in the case of a patent, at least one claim of the asserted patent). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:57 pm by Zachary Spilman
Conklin, 63 M.J. 333, 337 (C.A.A.F. 2006) (quoting United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On March 1, 2012, Align Technology, Inc. of San Jose, California (“Align”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]