Search for: "People v High"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 15,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2018, 5:44 am
The two key cases are Province of Bombay v Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay [1947] AC 58 and Lord Advocate v Dumbarton District Council [1990] 2 AC 580. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:11 am
The Nebraska case of State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am
But it is unnecessary and perhaps could be misinterpreted for the judge to post the decision to these three people. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
It has been widely debated in recent cases (R (Smith) v Secretary for Defence [2010] UKSC 29 (see our post); Al-Skeini & Others v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153, currently before the Grand Chamber; Bankovic v Belgium [2001] 11 BHRC 435) whether Article 1 ECHR guarantees the rights and freedoms of the Convention to those outside of the State’s jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 9:07 am
R. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:25 pm
That was the case in State of Missouri v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:49 pm
That was the reasoning behind the district court’s decision to exclude evidence in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:17 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:22 am
More fun, of course, since it's (1) an actual trial, and (2) you're working with people instead of boxes. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
People are killed. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
People are killed. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Lange v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
In some ways the case reflects the problem posed by Parkes QC in Hodges v Naish. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
See, e.g., Wesche v Mecosta Co Rd Comm , 480 Mich 75, 91 n 13 (2008); Al-Shimmari v Detroit Med Ctr, 477 Mich 280, 297 n 10; 731 NW2d 29 (2007); Neal v Wilkes, 470 Mich 661, 667 n 8; 685 NW2d 648 (2004); People v Hickman, 470 Mich 602, 610 n 6; 684 NW2d 267 (2004); Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 203 n 19; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:01 pm
The plaintiffs in Homaidan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
Seems the "honorable" Douglas Miller didn't want to be subpoenaed because of the "heightened standard that high level officials are not subject to legal process. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
More than 30,000 people entered immigration detention in 2015. [read post]
