Search for: "People v. London" Results 1801 - 1820 of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) Several months ago I posted a draft syllabus for a new course on Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:02 am by INFORRM
However, and this is essential, it still requires the violation of the dignity of one or more concrete persons, and not of an abstract group such as ‘the Congolese’ or black people in general. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
As pointed out by the Court of Appeal in Rakusen v Jepson (our note) and as summarised by the FTT: The definitions are wide enough to include a number of different people in respect of a property. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Michael Douglas
The respondents are foreign companies: Princess Cruise Lines Ltd is incorporated in Bermuda and headquartered in California; Carnival plc is a UK company which functions together with a Panama-incorporated US-headquartered company, and is dual listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by chief
In which the Nearly Legal team gain exclusive access to a (highly) fictionalised account of one man’s inside view of legislation currently going through Parliament, insofar as it relates to housing *** Morley Peckwitch, Member of Parliament for Dunny-on-the-Wold, leaned against the bar in the Smoking Room. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:13 am by INFORRM
This was characterised by Lord Pannick in House of Lords debate as the bringing of proceedings ‘by people who have no connection to t [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:13 am by INFORRM
In fact, the European Court of Human Rights first used the term ‘SLAPP’ only as recently as 2022 in OOO Memo v Russia. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Oh, and the slow train into London was lightly scented with vomit. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 12:48 am by INFORRM
We should have seen it coming Some, including Dr Orla Lynskey of the London School of Economics, are unfazed, arguing that ‘We should have seen it coming’ because ‘the case law prior to Google Spain is entirely consistent with the court’s findings in the judgment’. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
People with access to high-quality information will get ahead. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
(The two had previously been colleagues in the company’s London office). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:41 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" wonders @ExtremeTech pjblack.me/x6czuC this is interesting: "Is Marriage Only For Rich People? [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am by Francis Davey
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]