Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 1801 - 1820 of 5,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”In addition, Thomas argued that allowing federal courts to overturn a state prisoner’s conviction and sentence was an “intru[sion] on state sovereignty … [that] overrides the State’s sovereign power to enforce societal norms through criminal law. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:20 am
The 4-4 split is along the well known divide of Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito vs. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am by Jeff Neuburger
That ruling also focused on the non-intrusive nature of the GPS device and the fact that it was battery-powered and did not utilize the car’s power system; did not affect its driving qualities or carrying capacity or even alter the vehicle’s appearance. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm by Jeff Neuburger
That ruling also focused on the non-intrusive nature of the GPS device and the fact that it was battery-powered and did not utilize the car’s power system; did not affect its driving qualities or carrying capacity or even alter the vehicle’s appearance. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
There is a powerful formalist case for getting rid of the filibuster. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
This can be traced back to the outcome of Pliva, Inc. v Mensing in 2011. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:04 am by Eleonora Rosati
As IPKat readers will know, a few weeks ago the US Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited judgment in Google v Oracle. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
There is also a distinction between federal-power and states-rights conservatives (whereas more liberal Justices tend to favor federal power fairly uniformly), so that particular appointments could revive limits on Congress's Commerce Clause power. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
There is also a distinction between federal-power and states-rights conservatives (whereas more liberal Justices tend to favor federal power fairly uniformly), so that particular appointments could revive limits on Congress's Commerce Clause power. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Gordon D. Todd
Surrounded by 5-4 nail-biters, the 3-3-3 split generated by Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:12 pm
  In sum, I think students can experience close to a "paradigm shift" in their view of how constitutional law works in a global course (I couldn't figure out how to fit Karl Popper in here from the prior posts so readers will have to settle for Thomas Kuhn). [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:40 am by GuestPost
Yesterday, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) gave its decision in the Pringle v. [read post]