Search for: "Providence Bank v. Billings"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 1,920
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2008, 9:43 pm
(v) Personnel records other than the payroll records required to be provided under paragraph (2). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Kentucky) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition __________________ Docket: 07-1234 Case name: The Long Island Savings Bank, FSB, et al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 10:52 pm
Cirrincione v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Berkos, No. 07-2294 Denials of motions to suppress and conviction for failure to pay child support are affirmed where: 1) a magistrate judge may properly issue a search warrant ordering the search and production of electronic evidence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 2703(a), where the warrant is directed to an out-of-state internet service provider; and 2) there was sufficient probable cause supporting a warrant to search defendant's home. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator Kim Carr… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:52 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:25 am
Group, LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:04 am
" The editorial also noted that the House Financial Services Committee had voted for a cardholder's bill of rights, but that banks oppose it. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:32 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 11:34 pm
We are continuing to monitor implementation of the federal bill and proposed state legislation that may provide additional resources. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:45 am
For additional information contact [www.gallerywatch.com]
Subscription needed for online access:
07/29/2008
Court Filing in the Matter of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:12 am
" People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP – take it to the bank: seminar covering valuing intellectual assets and using them to leverage financing: (IP finance) What’s risk got to do with it? [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:40 am
The court found the testimony by the deceased’s lawyer and a bank employee indicated that the deceased was interested in providing his sister with the authority to manage his finances and had not intended to gift her funds. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Importantly, this protection extends to more than just Internet service provider records, but also long-distance phone billing records and bank records, as well. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
blank">Bill of Rights. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
: (IP tango), China: Pfizer loses trade mark action against Jaingsu Lianhuan Pharmaceutical Co over 3D mark: (Rouse & Co International), India: More patents for new forms issued to generics: (Patent Circle), India: Gauri Kamath on drug ‘differential pricing’ in India: (Spicy IP), Mexico: Revised health supplies regulations promise changes for generics: (International Law Office), US: World drug pricing crisis: Congressmen criticise US Trade Representative over Special 301… [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:54 pm
On the other hand, if a bank lent the deceased money, its claim would be for a debt.Until the Supreme Court of British Columbia decision last week in Battrum v. [read post]
