Search for: "R G v. G S" Results 1801 - 1820 of 6,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè;… [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 8:52 am by Giles Peaker
Kaur v Griffith, County Court at Bromley. 25 July 2019 This was a set aside application of a possession order against Ms G. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:04 am by Kevin Sheerin
” Petitioner sought to annual OCA’s decision to terminate him because the Administrative Judge took into consideration additional time sheets that were submitted in OCA’s Brief but not presented at the hearing. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
R., 2022 QCCA 1225Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Yves-Marie Morissette, Julie Dutil et Marie-Josée HogueDate : 12 septembre 2022 Résumé PÉNAL (DROIT) — détermination de la peine — infractions de nature sexuelle — infractions sexuelles contre des enfants — attentat à la pudeur — victime âgée de 15 à 17 ans… [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
” Criminal Law: Bail R. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
No change in US law, no data transfer deals – German state DPA http://t.co/3qDHA434OF -> Blackburn, music creators push copyright issues http://t.co/nqugGZ52Q9 -> CJEU in Weltimmo confirms wide prescriptive but finds limited executive jurisdiction in EU data protection http://t.co/YGcKXFssEK -> Intermediary Liability and User Content under Europe’s New Data Protection Law: An FAQ https://t.co/qo5Fbgvb19 -> Productivity Commission in Australia releases roadmap for IP… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
R 50(3) and by analogy R 86, which establish the requirement that documents filed in the examining or opposition procedure be signed, do not in the board’s opinion directly apply to third party observations. [read post]