Search for: "Roman v. Roman" Results 1801 - 1820 of 2,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
  In doing so, the court reversed the state's lowe court of appeals decision in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 10:17 am
v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in;… [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:10 am
For example, Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 … [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:10 am
The Supreme Court's docket entry in Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Verret, Sunil Wahal, and Roman Weil.) [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 8:44 am
A "search" violates a reasonable expectation of privacy under the Supreme Court's decision in Katz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
A complaint containing factual claims that are flatly contradicted by documentary evidence should be dismissed (Well v Rambam, 300 AD2d 580, 581 [2002]; Kenneth R. v Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, 229 AD2d 159, 162 [1997], cert. denied 522 US 967 [1997]). [read post]