Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals" Results 1801 - 1820 of 2,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2017, 3:16 am by Michael Lowe
  The Supreme Court of the United States defined what is considered illegal obscenity in what has become known as “the Miller test” from Miller v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 9:28 am by Jeff Gamso
Impson (C.A. 5, 1977), 562 F. 2d 970, 971, certiorari denied (1978), 434 U.S. 1050; United States, ex rel. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
  In the panel's view, the Supreme Court's decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
The potential impact of the latter two clauses seems relatively inconsequential. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: State ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
” Mr. del Rosario also called on the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) to release the merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  Secondly (and in a similar vein), the defendants in one of the key cases decided thus far (Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Others [2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)) have evidently experienced a similar feeling of disbelief to Mr McEnroe as the chalk puffed up off the line and appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am by Marie Louise
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:40 am by Jim Gerl
  In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]