Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 3,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2021, 9:02 pm
Lucia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On Monday 12 March 2012 Sharp J gave a brief judgment in the case of British Pregnancy Advisory Service v The person using the alias “Pablo Escobar” – the case relating to the hacking of the claimant’s website ([2012] EWHC 572 (QB)). [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am
Hamilton Bank, triggering a sharp dissent and another debate among the justices about the meaning of stare decisis. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In Miree v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:31 am
” Young v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Sharp, et al., Cause Number 98-03533, is a sales tax protest and declaratory judgment lawsuit that is set for trial on November 10th. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
Wayfair also was a sharp break from Kennedy’s dormant commerce clause jurisprudence over the preceding three decades. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm
Sharp disagreement came as the full Circuit Court denied en banc rehearing in a cocaine sentencing case, United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am
As already mentioned, on 6 July 2012, Sharp J gave the long awaited judgment in El-Naschie v Macmillan, ([2012] EWHC1809 (QB)) heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:58 pm
XpertUniverse, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
In the Courts The trial in the case of El-Naschie v Macmillan continued before Mrs Justice Sharp on 14, 16, 17 and 18 November 2011. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In a sharp 2-1 decision, the appeals court judges agreed with Jarkesy. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
Actavis argued that Lilly's experts, Professors Hill and Sharp, made a fundamental error in that they had a mistaken believe that the Patent was an authoritative document in which statements made in it had to be supported by evidence. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court (Mills v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:55 pm
(See, e.g., Hall v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
On 28 June 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Ltd. [read post]
