Search for: "Springs v. United States"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 1,984
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2008, 6:33 am
In the Constitution of the United States, they (corporations) are delegated no authority to make our laws and define our culture. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 11:17 am
Supreme Court, about why the Framers of the United States Constitution gave the Senate the sole power to try impeachments:The Framers labored over the question of where the impeachment power should lie. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
CASE OF HIRST v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:11 am
., v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
State Bd. of Education (1982) 32 Cal.3d 779, 795; Bozung v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:50 am
United States, 436 U.S. 816 (1978) (expertly summarized and analyzed on Agricultural Law by Amy Broadmoore). [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 8:25 am
Chron., Oct. 29, 2008. 9 Elie Mystal, Thank God For Good Lawyers: Google Destroys Libraries, Not The Law, Above The Law, Oct. 29, 2008.10 Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:47 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware) just reaffirmed, in the context of an ERISA plan that offers employees the option of investing in a fund consisting solely of the employer's own securities, there is a "presumption that a fiduciary acted prudently in investing in employer securities" and that, to rebut the presumption, "a 'plaintiff must show that the ERISA fiduciary could not… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 3:26 am
See also Rogers v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:00 am
In the spring of 1954, prior to his decision in Brown v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 6:13 pm
Ironically, the court heard oral arguments more than a year ago, in the spring of 2007. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
United States, 746 F. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
The United States presented no r other evidence to controvert that offered by Knellinger. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Gonzales, United States Attorney General, and Michael E. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Martin argues that the district court erred in calculating his advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines ("USSG") range by (1) applying the two-level enhancement under USSG § 2G2.1(b)(5) because the child victims were in his care, custody, or super [read post]
