Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 1801 - 1820 of 3,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Brent Lorentz
  According to the LA Times: In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Noriega alleges that “Call of Duty: Black Ops II” portrays him as “a kidnapper, murderer and enemy of the state. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
Appeals in most States are wholly governed by an intricate web of statutes, and appellate court interpretations of statutes. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
  To these Supreme Court cases, we append the more recent Superior Court case of Makripodis v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:36 pm by Jeralyn
Additionally, in developing this proposed regulation, the CDCR was guided by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Baze v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:55 am by Bruce Nye
Foster Wheeler (2008), ___Cal.Rptr.___, Superior Court of Los Angeles County; BC336869. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:31 am
Last Thursday, May 26, 2011, the California Court of Appeal for the Second District (in Los Angeles) issued its decision in State of California ex rel. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
 Even more so given that the overwhelming majority of criminal cases end with plea bargains.The California Supreme Court decides the issue. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am by Andrew Trask
 For anyone outside the Ninth Circuit (or really, California), this opinion seemed largely inconsequential--most circuits had already ruled that you couldn't simply apply one state's law to a nationwide class to make it certifiable. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am by Greg Mersol
  While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 5:57 pm by AALRR
Superior Court (2000) 79 Cal.App.4th 1420, the California Court of Appeal held that employers who defeat claims for allegedly unpaid overtime wages or minimum wages are not entitled to recover their attorneys fees. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm by Amy Howe
Superior Court that a father from New Jersey could be served with a lawsuit while visiting his children in California – a form of jurisdiction known as “tag” jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
"Since New York was not the child's "home state," and there was no local evidence as to the "child's care, protection, training and personal relationships," the AD3 concluded that the Family Count lacked jurisdiction and the Superior Court of California is where the dispute belonged.So, as far as the New York courts was concerned, John got zippo! [read post]