Search for: "State v House" Results 1801 - 1820 of 28,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Orin Kerr
  Can the police search the house then? [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:39 pm
 Justice Finch, as he then was, in Frolek v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 9:51 pm by Patent Docs
ACI faculty will offer presentations on the following topics: • Regulatory and Legislative Developments Impacting the Biopharmaceutical Industry • The Impact of Amgen v Sanofi on In-House Patenting Strategies • The "Skinny Label" Post-GSK v Teva regarding Biosimilar Carve-Outs • Litigation Strategies for Challenging Reference Drug Patents in IPRs • APJs speaking on Practice, Policy, and Procedure • A "Think Tank" on… [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Housing Authority and a Multi-Racial Approach to the Equal Protection Clause (Parts 1 and 2)Herbert Resner and the Decline of Radical LawyeringJoseph V. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 844 This appeal considered whether a condition restricting the use of the premises should be implied into a planning permission granted by the appellant; alternatively, whether the planning permission should be interpreted as containing such a condition. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 6:30 am by EEM
Thomas Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 3 (2017) [full-text]Putting Lives at Risk: Protection Failures Affecting Hondurans and Salvadorans Deported from the United States and Mexico (Refugees International, Feb. 2018) [text]The White House’s Immigration Framework Would Eviscerate Immigration from Latin America, Africa, and Asia (Center for American Progress, Feb. 2018) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (8 Feb. 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am by Joshua Thompson and Ralph Kasarda
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:40 am by Rick Hills
Clearing House Ass'n suggests that the justices are feeling a little abashed at how their aggressive defense of preemption in Watters v. [read post]