Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 1801 - 1820
of 15,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2009, 6:10 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
The result in State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade… [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
Although Supreme Court had granted NYPD's cross motion, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court's ruling.Initially addressing NYPD's challenge to Petitioner's standing to maintain this action, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Fleisher v New York State Liq. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Although Supreme Court had granted NYPD's cross motion, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court's ruling.Initially addressing NYPD's challenge to Petitioner's standing to maintain this action, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Fleisher v New York State Liq. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
Ms B sought a s.202 review and requested accommodation pending review under s.188(3). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am
C. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
In Administrator v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am
(c) LIMITATION. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:28 am
It sorted Haycock's entries into the following categories: (a) vague entries, (b) irrelevant entries and (c) block billed entries. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
§3731(b)(1) begins to run when the cause of action accrues); TRW Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:24 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Christopher C. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:52 am
") AC35312 - State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:52 am
The Court then cited Master Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Given the continuous nature of Breslin's assignment, the light-duty standard set forth in 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) was properly applied to petitioners' application for disability retirement benefits (see Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Vicks v Hevesi, 45 AD3d at 1038; see also Matter of Lamb v DiNapoli, 128 AD3d at 1321). [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:59 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:59 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:08 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Robert C. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation" - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]
