Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 27,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Audit system could be a solution, involvement of member states could be a solution, but we have to discuss the issues openly. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:34 pm
Reagan Outdoor Advertising, Inc v City of Austin, 2023 WL 270582 (5th Circ. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:59 pm
Again, the Appellate Division denied assertion and stated that “[t]he record sufficiently established that the Theatre constitutes a “landmark” within the meaning of Code of the Town of Hempstead . . . [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:31 am
That first SEP AASI (Nokia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 3:09 pm
The Decision in Gregg v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Free Speech L. __ (2023). [2] Winter v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:36 am
From C.M. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
Absent a definition of “intent to defraud” in the New York penal code, case law has developed to define its parameters. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
” The review decision barely dealt with this, stating: “140. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:04 pm
Management Properties, LLC v Town of Redington Shores, 352 SO 3d 909 (Fl. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
The report contains a set of draft articles on immunity of state officials from the criminal jurisdiction of a foreign country. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am
Outlining his approach, Wood Ch. observed: “[15] …the problem complained of has denied them the opportunity of maintaining the grave in a dignified and respectful state despite their best endeavours. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:33 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
Regardless of whether these things are positive states of events (e.g., that a building was "inhabited") or negative (e.g., that a building was "uninhabited" or that a victim "was not yet twelve years of age").In the actual case decided today, the relevant statute (Section 368(d) of the Penal Code) says that you get two, three or four years in prison if you're (a) "not a caretaker" of an elder or dependent adult, but (b) embezzle, steal… [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 5:03 am
’ —Mohammad Ali 1Parkes v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
As the Court explained in Masson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Historically, software license agreements have greatly limited the liability for software manufacturers and distributors for vulnerabilities in their code. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:47 am
State Farm Ins. [read post]