Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 1:57 am
Further, although as I have stated it is very possible that the court will decide to make a reference at the conclusion of the trial, I am not convinced that such reference will be necessary, which is of course a pre-condition to the jurisdiction to make a reference at all". [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
Which points back to Shapiro v Ettenson, a case I’ve written about several times before (here, here, and here). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
However, in view of this evidence, Mr Justice Birss did find that the behaviour of Roche in withdrawing an appeal in order to avoid an adverse decision by a Board of Appeal (and the extra weight this would have over an Examining Division decision), was obvious shielding. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
The Court of Appeal held this to be a correct state of the law and their Lordships agree. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:00 am by Florian Mueller
Nokia 5G trial I've already reported on, the same division of the court--the Seventh Civil Chamber under Presiding Judge Dr. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Rajiv Kr. Choudhry
”Patentability of computer programs, had before Lantana’s case, been heard in the UK Court of Appeals in HTC v Applecase. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1990, the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:37 am by Amy Howe
The justices took up their appeals, agreeing to address only the Chevron question in Relentless v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
The case arose out of a batch of appeals from the Delhi and Calcutta High Courts in which an order of a single judge on an application to enforce a foreign award had been challenged before a Division Bench, under Letters Patent Rules. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am by Susan Brenner
This post examines an opinion the Superior Court of New Jersey – Appellate Division recently issued in a civil case:  Warren Hospital, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 11:30 am by Beth S. Lyons
  Law reflected these divisions, and the challenge was to use the system – if possible – to level the playing field so that the rule of law was applied with equality to all. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Steve Delchin
  Though the Court did not elaborate on its ruling, one of the reasons for keeping the appeal on a normal briefing schedule was because the plaintiffs already had received the limited relief that they sought (death certificates listing their out-of-state, same-sex marriage), and the relief will remain in place during the appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
In People v Jenkins (2008 NY Slip Op 07992 [10/23/08]) the Court of Appeals considered who has to prove what in order for a defendant to be entitled to specific compliance of a plea agreement. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Last month, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments that raised constitutional questions concerning the Copyright Royalty Board. [read post]