Search for: "State v. Hadding"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 124,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2020, 12:08 pm
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Credit for time served Tyree Kevin Crawford filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County in which he alleged that his sentence to life imprisonment, all but 40 years suspended, for first-degree murder was illegal because the court had failed to ... [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
He presents a single issue for our review: Whether the circuit court erred in denying his petition without a hearing in light of his allegation that his defense counsel had not informed him of the precise immigration consequences of pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit robbery. [read post]
26 Aug 2004, 9:12 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 12:26 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
(See Hall v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:45 pm
In State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Edge won in State v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 8:29 am
Bernie unveiled a tape recording from 2007 of a telephone conversation between him and Tacopina, which the latter had previously stated never occurred. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
That was where he had lived on a settled basis and where he was integrated into a family and social environment. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #SOURCEHuskey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
In two previous blogs, here and here , we have discussed the United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 8:48 am
The Scotus Wiki page for Cone v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am
McElrath v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:26 am
Sveen v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 10:00 pm
# # #DECISIONPILI v HIIE [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
In Finley v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
Dukes Supreme Court decision more narrowly than many had expected, surprising those who viewed Dukes (in concert with AT&T v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court at one time interpreted the clause to bar admission of out-of-court statements that lacked adequate indicia of reliability (Ohio v. [read post]
