Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
Priority: Applicant ADOL proved that it first used the subject marks in the United States in April 2004. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
Local Ad Link v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:26 pm
Justice Heald, in the case of Schenley Distilleries Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Supreme Court a petition for writ of certiorari (here), seeking review of the Eighth Circuit's decision in B & B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
In McCallum Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:54 am
Brock v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 4:01 am
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
Ct. 1955, 1965 (2007) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 5:43 am
" United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
D & P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:17 am
Tommie Copper IP, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 7:24 am
Jerome’s Furniture Warehouse v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 6:30 am
For example, in McMullan Bros & Maxol v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:24 pm
SEC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 11:21 am
Quinn and Friedrichs v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
TRADE MARKSLise Charles (WTR) provides an overview of the most-read posts on Word Trademark Review (WTR) on European trade mark case law over the past year, including analyses of cases dealing with issues such as unconventional signs (i.e., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:27 pm
") Rhino Sports v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The bill calls to mind the Supreme Court's ruling in Matal v. [read post]