Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2006, 12:10 pm by Editor
In its application for provisional measures, Uruguay argues “the stated purpose of the blockade is to compel [it] to accede to Argentina’s demand that it permanently ends construction of the Botnia cellulose plant . . . and to prevent the plant from ever coming into operation. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Eric Biber
In many ways, we see general permits as the future of the regulatory state. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
During the “Dirty War,” the lawsuit claimed, the Argentine subsidiary identified workers at the plant as alleged subversives or union agitators, pointing them out to state security forces within the plant. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Dr. Mel Kramer
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Guest Blogger
  Construing a state regulation as “environmental” doesn’t insulate it from Commerce Clause review, as the town of Clarkstown, New York found out in C&A Carbone, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court to conflict with a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scheme in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:49 am
Ciambriello to the non-competitive class position of Plant Maintenance Mechanic II [PMM-II]. [read post]