Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 44,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2020, 4:34 am
The case, Elleby v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:52 am
Division I and Division II of the Washington State Court of Appeals both issued decisions in favor of local governments seeking to comply with the Public Records Act (PRA). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:03 pm
In Penrod v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:36 am
Wen Dong Zhao v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 9:02 am
In addition, there is a recent appeal to the Supreme Court in a case called Capitol Records, Inc. v Vimeo LLC where record companies essentially raise the opposite argument – contending that the fact that pre-1972 recordings are covered by state law means that they should be excluded from coverage under Section 512 safe harbor for user-generated content (see our articles here and here about the safe harbor). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 pm
Apparently the other Ford dealer did not authorize this transaction, and all transactions were recorded on video tape. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 8:48 am
In Partenfelder v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:29 pm
White v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:15 am
” R.C. 149.43(A)(1)(v). [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:27 am
"Application of AEDPA to Review of State Determinations of Fact (Wood v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
Additional Resources: Marks v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:32 am
Junior Martinez-Guzman which stated in a footnote that Registry of Motor Vehicle documents are admissible as business records without live testimony. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 8:23 am
United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:58 pm
We discussed one of several cases called United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
West filed a public records request action against the City and Vermillion.West v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Similarly, while the narrow holding was that the law at issue was unconstitutional because it allowed some nonconsensual recordings -- particularly, body-worn cameras by police officers -- but not others, most state laws contain the same exceptions.So for states -- including California -- with two-party consent statutes, if the opinion stands, I doubt that most of them would survive. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 4:35 am
Earlier this month, in Benjamin v Island Management LLC, the Connecticut Supreme Court again broke new ground under RULLCA, interpreting its provisions governing the rights of members in manager-managed LLCs to inspect books and records. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:17 am
Additional Resources: State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 3:49 pm
They are also expanding both qualified immunity, which often protects both state and federal officials from paying damages, as well as flawed doctrine from Monell v. [read post]
