Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 11,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2008, 8:38 am
Subscription needed for online access:
STATE DECISIONS:
Save Hamilton Open Space v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:46 am
MCVICKER V. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:19 am
In Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) the District Court granted the petition for return. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:54 am
The Plaintiffs’ Child Dies in a Tragic 2011 Fire The plaintiffs in the case of Hosford v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 12:52 am
And so, this week Arnold LJ handed down his judgment in FibroGen v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:50 am
In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Iowa Supreme Court’s opinion released on March 27, 2020 in Blue Grass Savings Bank v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:01 am
Olive v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:19 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Badgerow v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:18 am
Leroy Carhart in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:15 am
Wojciechowicz v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 11:17 pm
” United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:22 am
A few examples are given below:Section 1(2) of the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Amendment) Act, 2000 stated: "(2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in Official Gazette, appoint. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Century Indemnity Co., case number CTQ-2016-00005, in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, where he points out how a win for Global Re could result in a huge windfall for the reinsurer by saving on its defense costs, since reinsurers typically must pay both indemnity and defense costs. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:19 pm
Century Indemnity Co., case number CTQ-2016-00005, in the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, where he points out how a win for Global Re could result in a huge windfall for the reinsurer by saving on its defense costs, since reinsurers typically must pay both indemnity and defense costs. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that it is well settled that "proceeding under article 78 is not the proper vehicle to test the constitutionality of legislative enactments" in contrast to a judicial challenge directed at the procedures followed by the legislature rather than the substance of the enactment, which "... is maintainable in an article 78 proceeding," citing Matter of Save the Pine Bush v City of Albany, 70 NY2d 193. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that it is well settled that "proceeding under article 78 is not the proper vehicle to test the constitutionality of legislative enactments" in contrast to a judicial challenge directed at the procedures followed by the legislature rather than the substance of the enactment, which "... is maintainable in an article 78 proceeding," citing Matter of Save the Pine Bush v City of Albany, 70 NY2d 193. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Federal vs State Law for Patent Licensing: Cheetah Omni LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
As I noted yesterday (here), the Supreme Court's opinion in Gonzales v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:44 pm
In today's groundbreaking opinion in Stengart v. [read post]
