Search for: "State v. Sherman" Results 1801 - 1820 of 1,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
The Constitution expressly states that the president can be impeached for bribery. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:11 am by admin
., non-criminal) “reviewable matters” under the Act include abuse of dominance (or monopolization as it is referred to in the United States under the Sherman Act), civil misleading advertising, refusal to deal, price maintenance and certain types of “vertical” restraints by dominant firms (e.g., exclusive dealing and tied selling). [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by Alden Abbott
The new statement should define an unfair method of competition as involving conduct that violates one of the two core antitrust statutes, the Sherman Act or the Clayton Act—no more, no less. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 2:04 pm by Guest Author
  The recent decision by Judge Amit Mehta in United States et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, one “antitrust” exclusion precludes coverage for any claim “any actual or alleged price fixing; restraint of trade, monopolization, or unfair trade practices, including actual or alleged violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, the Clayton Act, or similar provisions [of] any state, federal or local statutory law or common law anywhere in the world. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
  A number of states that have passed anti price-gouging legislation have recognized the disadvantage of the ambiguous standard and have opted for more specific standards in the form of percentage-caps or no-increase laws. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am by Victoria Kwan
” On her return to the states, Ginsburg spoke to students at Duke Law School’s D.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Alden Abbott
Supreme Court most recently stressed, in 2005’s Volvo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm by Alden Abbott
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]