Search for: "State v. Stevens"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 7,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Jackson Women's Health Organization: Reckoning with its Impact and Charting a Path Forward, (University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2023).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Berta Esperanza Hernandez-Truyol, Awakening the Law: Unmasking Free Exercise Exceptionalism, 72 Emory Law Journal 1061-1104 (2023).Karin Carmit Yefet & Ido Shahar, Divorced from Citizenship: Palestinian-Christian Women between the Church and the Jewish… [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
Or consider the somewhat obscure but incredibly important United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Nina Rivkind & Steven F. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
California Appeals Court Affirms Ruling That Section 28 Tax Does Not Apply To Surplus Lines Insurers
7 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
Silvers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:21 pm
Here are some comments & links from around the blogosphere:Analyis of Heller by Lawrence Solum (or scroll down)Initial Thoughts on Heller by Orin Kerr & Key Limitations of Heller by Orin Kerr The Second Amendment and State and Local Laws by Eugene Volokh My Sense of the Bottom Line from Heller by Tom Goldstein Heller Discussion Board: "Clarity is in the Eye of the Beholder by Alan Morrison Heller, Justice Steven's Dissent, and the Historian's… [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:38 am
Aubry Johnson v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:36 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority in Danforth v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:27 pm
CNN's Bill Mears reports that the case could affect state laws in the twenty-two states that have laws similar to the federal restrictions overruled today. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:45 pm
Kennedy, Sonia Sotomayor, and John Paul Stevens. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:48 am
Stevens, 462 F.3d 1169, 1170 (9th Cir. 2006). [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am
In a video for ISCOTUS, Steven Heyman previews tomorrow’s oral arguments in Wood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:50 am
See Durand v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:18 pm
Justice Stevens addressed the issue in Danforth and argued that “not a word in our Payne opinion suggests that the Court intended to prohibit state courts from applying new constitutional standards in a broader range of cases than we require. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:02 am
In 1997, in Kansas v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 1:45 am
See COTW blog here, discussing United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Scrivani, Stevens & Lee, Elizabeth Ware, Stevens & Lee, pro hac vice & Nicholas H. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 6:45 am
Here is the abstract: Addressing the Supreme Court’s decision last Term in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm
¶39 (quoting Stevens v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:06 am
” Briefly: In an op-ed for The Atlantic, adapted from his new memoir, retired Justice John Paul Stevens asserts that “District of Columbia v. [read post]
