Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 8:02 am
By Michael Kun On Monday, June 25, 2011, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Coito v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
MannionM.D.Pa.The court confirmed that the issues in this case were being addressed after the previous issuance of the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s decision in Rush v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm
However, where the issue of the superior right of possession can be determined separately from title issues, the justice court has jurisdiction to decide the case. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:42 pm
Thus, under United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:42 pm
Thus, under United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:03 pm
In Reber v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:44 am
The recent decision in the Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Socko v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:43 pm
” The district court rejected AT&T’s argument and ordered remand to state court. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Both cases were filed in state court and removed to federal court. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Campbell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
The trial court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge Zaven V. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:51 am
The Court notes that at least two other states have deemed similar provisions contrary to public policy. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 9:33 am
The Supreme Judicial Court is due to hear oral argument on January 4, 2010 in the matter of Wheatley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Facts: This case (Superior Consulting Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
Facts: This case (Superior Consulting Services, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
Temple v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:00 am
Superior Court unconscionability rule to the arbitration clause in a consumer cell-phone contract. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm
On March 23, 2022, in Estrada v. [read post]