Search for: "State v. Weeks" Results 1801 - 1820 of 42,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 10:42 am by Ashby Jones
And measures have been introduced in 17 states which mimics a Nebraska law banning abortion at 20 weeks. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 4:45 am by Yishai Schwartz
” In Guantanamo news, Wells provided daily coverage of motions hearings in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm by Steven M. Gursten
Carrier for lawyers One week ago, the Michigan Supreme Court restored common sense to the state’s auto accident law with its ruling on McCormick v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
Davis (06-666), asking whether the “dormant” Commerce Clause prohibits a state from exempting interest income from in-state bonds while taxing interest income from bonds issued by other states. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:59 am
For those who are interested, we are posting the briefs filed thus far in Wilkie v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 679. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And in my last week as the lawfare intern, I attended oral arguments in Ralls Corporation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:15 am by war
Last week the parties were in court fighting over discovery. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:59 am by Simon Birkett, Clean Air in London
They say timing is everything and it certainly was when the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ClientEarth v The Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2015] UKSC 28 on 29 April 2015. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:15 pm by Gene Quinn
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Google v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 1:27 pm
The state is likely to appeal the decision.Major League Baseball Advanced Media, et al. v. [read post]