Search for: "Stone, in Re"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 3,998
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2015, 4:13 pm
As some readers may be aware, Dolly was the focus of In re Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), 750 F.3d 1333 (2014), an important patentable subject matter eligibility case decided by the Federal Circuit last May.While Roslin dealt with animal cloning and patent law, a recent Fifth Circuit case, Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:29 am
Kongstad, re: Independence of the Boards of Appeal On behalf of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys I submit the following comments on this matter of great importance.The EPC set up a system with a rough separation of powers between:- a legislative/oversight body (the Administrative Council); an executive body (the Office through the President); a judiciary (the Boards of Appeal). [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Mick and I knew by now that really our job was to write songs for the Stones. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Mick and I knew by now that really our job was to write songs for the Stones. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 11:01 am
If you're reading this as a confession that she was drunk, I'm guessing you're an ideologue. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 5:25 am
It’s one of the things they’re really good at. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:33 am
If you get really stoned and then get behind the wheel, you're asking for trouble.What we do need, however, are better roadside mechanisms for detecting marijuana-related impairment. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
“They’re getting a tainted product out! [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 8:15 am
If you’re not ready to acknowledge harms done by people on your “own” side (left, right, libertarian, traditionalist or whatever) you’re probably not helping the vaccination debate. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Stone (Univ. of Chicago Law School) Rebecca Tushnet (Georgetown Univ. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:45 pm
For the uninitiated, here’s the lowdown: Songs recorded before February 16, 1972 aren’t covered under the 1976 Copyright Act; instead, they’re covered by preexisting state copyright regimes. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:52 am
Stone here). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
Last week was another busy one at the IPKat, so it may not be surprising if some missed a post or two. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:43 am
(See the article in re/CODE which highlight’s the use of social media and emerging technology the sex trade.) [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 2:55 pm
The products were distributed only in the State of Georgia, directly to consumers at the retail level from the Stone Mountain Pecan Company, located in Monroe. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:29 am
In the EU, the CJEU's controversial ruling in Case C-128/11 UsedSoft gave rise to limited circumstances where downloaded computer software could be lawfully re-sold on the basis that the distribution right under the Software Directive had been exhausted. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
| GC on ‘Monaco’ trade mark in Case T-197/13 Monaco v OHIM | Corriere della Sera major infringement in Charlie Hebdo case | GoPro and Apple patent | Biotech patent case law.Never too late 28 [week ending Sunday 11 January] -- German Minister for Agriculture against GIs | Europe’s 2015 resolutions re innovation | All the must-read IP blogs | UK and EU Parliaments v the EPO | The bizzarre EPO BoA’s Business Distribution Scheme | UPC location in… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm
On January 19th, China’s Ministry of Commerce ("MOFCOM") released a draft of a new Foreign Investment Law (“Draft FIL”) for public comment. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 5:45 pm
., the once-fundamental concept that the main purpose of a trademark is to tell the public “what you think you’re buying is what you really are buying” — from its rationale. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
” That would kill two birds with one stone. [read post]
