Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
Kerson Co. v Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Levine, 45 NY2d 730, 732; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, 21 AD3d 1082, 1083; Rau v Borenkoff, 262 AD2d 388, 389; Lattimore v Bergman, 224 AD2d 497). [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
We had the benefit of listening to the oral argument in CA v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:38 am
An interesting Afghanistan habeas decision today, from the UK: Yunus Ramhmatullah v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am
Personnel note: the Russian troll’s lawyers are Dennis Edward Boyle and Blerina Jasari of Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP and Christopher Daniel Sullivan of Diamond McCarthy LLP. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
In Butt v. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 10:56 pm
Sullivan (the case is bin al-Shibh v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
Richman pointed us to a federal statute called the Hyde Amendment, which, according to this 2005 Second Circuit opinion in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 6:05 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
” In reaching this latter conclusoin, Judge Sullivan rejected the applicability of the 1928 Zeig v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am
There is little doubt that Dominion’s suit for damages met and indeed exceeded the standard the Supreme Court established in 1964 in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:39 am
Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Gonzalez, Sweeny, ... [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
LAWRENCE, J.P., and SULLIVAN and HARWOOD, JJ., concur. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 291 (quoting City of Chicago v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 291 (quoting City of Chicago v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Sullivan.) [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am
from Ex parte O’SULLIVAN Accordingly, Doss satisfies all of the limitations of claim 12. [read post]
