Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2009, 10:08 am
" Camilla Taylor, senior staff attorney for Lambda Legal in Chicago and lead counsel on the Iowa case, also explains the rationale for targeting in Iowa. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 3:57 pm
" (Taylor v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 12:23 am
Summer, from James Thomson's The Seasons The fifth item in the little bundle of photocopied articles on IP history which this Kat researched and wrote back in the 1980s, when he was still a full-time academic, takes a look at two cases which, though never read by copyright lawyers today, can be found surprising often on students' reading lists (no -- most students don't read them either): the twin peaks of 18th copyright case law in England, Millar v Taylor and… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:46 pm
[Taylor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 6:52 am
Taylor] [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:09 pm
The Court emphasized, citing Shepard v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:41 am
Taylor, 353 U.S. 569 (1957). [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re discusses qualified immunity and last week’s summary reversal in Taylor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 4:30 am
This claim is not duplicative of the legal malpractice claim, as plaintiff’s complaints regarding the over billing were not a direct challenge to the quality of the work but instead a claim that the fee paid bore no rational relationship to the work performed (see Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Johnson, 129 AD3d at 70). [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:05 am
Supreme Court decision, and damages in his individual capacity claims were precluded by defendants' qualified immunity.In Taylor v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
Jeffrey Taylor was the Assistant District Attorney who prosecuted the case. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:53 pm
In the seminal case of Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court denied eight applications for leave to appeal, including: Odom v City of Detroit, No. 142483, where Justices Marilyn Kelly and Hathaway would grant leave; People v Taylor, No. 142390, where Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave; People v Kerr, No. 142257, where Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave and Justice Zahra did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel; and Spayth v City… [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:58 pm
State, a possession of cocaine case out of Taylor County:Appellant's opening - Stan BrownState's response - Patricia K. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:14 am
") AC31732 - State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:12 pm
Dodd, 111 Wn.2d 174, 178-79, 759 P.2d 455 (1988); Taylor v. [read post]
