Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Banks" Results 1801 - 1820 of 4,975
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2017, 3:16 pm by Giles Peaker
As per H and Others v Ealing, the Defendant had to meet the four stage test in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) (2014) AC 700 (1) is there a sufficiently important objective (i.e. legitimate aim), (2) is the measure rationally connected to that objective, (3) is it the least intrusive measure which could be used without unacceptably compromising the objective and (4) in adopting the measure has the defendant struck a fair balance between the importance of securing the… [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
Credit card holders (who may pay annual service charges) draw on a credit limit approved by the card issuer such as a bank, store, or service provider (an airline, for example). [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
While in some contexts, such as banking and commerce, it may readily be seen that an obligation on the part of the bank or merchant to use reasonable measures to safeguard a customer’s sensitive information is part of the bargain, the same cannot be said when an employee provides personal information to an employer as part of the hiring process, the court explained. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Hudson (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 575, 581–582, review granted October 26, 2016, S237340 [bank is commercial establishment]; People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:29 am by Larry Tolchinsky
Example of Bank Moving for Continuance after Trial Starts:  the Serban case An example of this type of continuance was made by the bank in the case of HSBC Bank USA, NA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
People transferred gold and silver to each other in order to satisfy important obligations as well as to obtain items of more direct and obvious use. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
 In 1968 Gonzáles led a Chicano contingent in the Poor People’s March on Washington, D.C. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
 In 1968 Gonzáles led a Chicano contingent in the Poor People’s March on Washington, D.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
That means you’ve got to shut down your phone, leave your office and meet people outside the office, perhaps by volunteering, joining a group like Rotary, or through bar work. [read post]