Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 1801 - 1820 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
United States, the state tried to compel a criminal defendant into taking antipsychotic medication after failing a competency evaluation to stand trial. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 8-1 that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:59 pm
The Supreme Court has held that three conditions must be met before a writ may issue: (1) the petitioner “must have no other adequate means to attain . . . relief,” (2) the petitioner must show that the right to mandamus is “clear and indisputable,” and (3) the court must be “satisfied that the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 1:21 pm by Alka Bahal
  Alka is situated in Fox Rothschild’s Morristown, New Jersey office though she practices throughout the United States and at Consulates worldwide. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:54 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced that the agency is preparing to reopen in-person services at its field offices, asylum offices, and application support centers (ASC) to the public on or after June 4. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 19-1145Issues: (1) Whether the generic term “organization” in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:46 pm by Josh Blackman
UNITED STATES The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:14 pm by Josh Blackman
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the respondent filed on March 6, 2020. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:06 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-783, involves an important issue that created a long-running circuit split: whether a person who is authorized to access information on a computer for certain purposes violates Section 1030(a)(2) of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act if he accesses the same information for an improper purpose. [read post]