Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 1801 - 1820 of 13,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 9:11 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
  Worse on law and policy, because it would indicate that standing for states under Massachusetts v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 5:48 pm by Frank Heft
The district court held that reckless offenses qualified as violent felonies and the Sixth Circuit affirmed citing United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:39 am by Ronald Mann
Thomas also relies on the court’s earlier decision in Shamrock Oil v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
 When asked about the topic by Judge Thomas Griffith, Paradis disputed the alleged waiver, and in two respects. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm by Christine Hurt
Justice Scalia, joined by Thomas, argues for holding the statute unconstitutionally vague, though the result would be the same for Skilling. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:45 am
Today I will be giving a presentation on immigration law along with my colleague, V. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
Providing employees with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out work related activities Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04280, Appellate Division, First Department [See, also, Sagal-Cotler v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 04281, Appellate Division, First Department] The genesis of the Thomas action: An individual… [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Providing employees with legal representation and reimbursement for legal fees and expenses incurred in defense of a civil action arising out work related activities Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04280, Appellate Division, First Department [See, also, Sagal-Cotler v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of the City of N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 04281, Appellate Division, First Department] The genesis of the Thomas action: An individual… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:54 am
., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07-5439 RALPH BAZE AND THOMAS C. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Tejinder Singh
Justice Thomas’s concurrence continues a theme that he first voiced in Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
The 9th (Thomas joined by Wallace and Leavy) hold that a district court can avert its eyes from what the defendant would have gotten in the state. [read post]